![]() |
| Opposition leader Juan Guaido has proclaimed himself the new interim president of Venezuela |
In this article, the main causes of the
economic collapse that Venezuela is suffering are analyzed. A country shaken by
extreme poverty and hyperinflation. Is international intervention the way out
of the crisis that plagues the Venezuelan people?
The situation in Venezuela has been
gaining tragedy for a number of years, but political and social conditions have
deteriorated sharply in recent months in the country, where tension grows in
the face of the possibility of international intervention.
Recent images show a country shaken by
poverty and hyperinflation, while the installation of a government parallel to
President-elect Nicolás Maduro intensified the internal and external political
crisis of an increasingly isolated diplomatic nation.
Since the beginning of the year, protests
have intensified over the departure of Maduro, who, in turn, rallies supporters
around large demonstrations to show that he has popular support.
In January, deputy Juan Guaidó declared
himself acting president of the country. He who had just taken office as
president of the National Assembly, the Venezuelan parliament, the last state
body under the control of the opposition.
More than 50 countries, including the
United States, Brazil, France, Spain, Argentina, Canada, Chile, Colombia,
Denmark, Ecuador and Peru, recognized Guaidó as the new Venezuelan
representative. But Bolivia, China, Cuba, Iran, Mexico and Russia declare
support for Maduro.
US President Donald Trump has already said
that a military intervention in Venezuela is not ruled out. Maduro countered by
accusing Trump of being a "white supremacist" who sought to
destabilize his country.
In turn, the United Nations (UN) called
for a "dialogue" in the country to avoid a "disaster". But
the request of meeting with Trump made by representatives of Maduro was
rejected.
In the face of the opposition's attempt to
bring humanitarian aid to the country through the borders with Brazil and
Colombia, Maduro ordered that access be closed in the currencies between the
countries, which generated conflicts in these places between the Venezuelan
military and demonstrators.
After the failure of the operation, Guaidó
asked allied countries to keep "all options on the table", but the
Lima Group, a bloc of 13 countries in the Americas, refused to use force to
remove Maduro from power.
HUNGER AND EXODUS
![]() |
| Market with empty shelves in venezuela |
HUNGER AND EXODUS
The Venezuelan crisis has not started now.
Hunger made Venezuelans lose an average of 11 kilos last year. Violence empties
the streets of big cities when nightfall. And the situation has caused a mass
exodus to neighboring countries.
PHOTO EMPTY SHELVES
The neighboring country is experiencing
the biggest recession in its history: 12 consecutive quarters of economic
recession, according to the National Assembly in July.
The size of the collapse can be seen in
the numbers of Gross Domestic Product. Between 2013 and 2017, Venezuelan GDP
fell by 37%. The International Monetary Fund expects this year to drop another
15%.
The situation was also explored in the
Brazilian election campaign. Candidates and voters opposed to the Workers'
Party, who historically supported the governments of Hugo Chavez and Nicolás
Maduro, tried to use the Venezuelan failure as an alert of what could happen in
Brazil with the election of Fernando Haddad.
The members of the workers' party, in
turn, recalled that Chavez was a military man and that it was with the direct
support and participation of the Armed Forces that Maduro had been ruling.
In August, the International Organization
for Migration linked to the UN said that the increase in the number of people
leaving Venezuela because of the hyperinflationary economic collapse makes it a
time of crisis to be close to that of refugees and migrants who cross the
Mediterranean to Europe .
In November, the UN reported that 3
million Venezuelans have left the country in recent years. But how has the
situation in Venezuela reached this point.
(1) PETROLEUM CRISIS
Venezuela has the largest oil reserves in
the world - and the resource is virtually the only source of foreign revenue in
the country.
After World War I, successive Venezuelan
rulers left agricultural and industrial development aside to focus on oil,
which now accounts for 96% of exports - a near-total dependency.
The bet on oil was safe for years and gave
good results at times when the price of the barrel was high. Between 2004 and
2015, in the governments of Hugo Chávez and the beginning of Nicolás Maduro -
elected in 2013 after the death of his political godfather, in the same year,
the country received 750 billion dollars from the sale of oil.
The Chávez government took advantage of
this rain of the so-called "petrodollars" to finance from social
programs to imports of almost everything that was consumed in the country.
But by 2014, the price of oil has
collapsed. Partly because of the refusal of Iran and Saudi Arabia - two other
major producers - to sign a pledge to cut output. Other factors were the
deceleration of the Chinese economy and the growth in the US of the oil and gas
production market through the fracking method - the hydraulic fracturing of rocks.
Earlier that year, having peaked at $
138.54 in 2008, the price of a barrel of oil was trading at about $ 100 dollars
and fell by half at the end of the year, keeping that significant drop until
this year, when it returned to reach the level of $ 80.
In addition to receiving less money for
its main product, Venezuela also had a significant drop in production. When
Chávez took over the country for the first time in 1999, production was more
than 3 million barrels a day. Today, it is about 1.5 million, according to the
Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) - the worst level in
33 years.
This drop in production was mainly due to
the poor management of PDVSA, Petróleos de Venezuela, the state that manages
the exploitation of the resource in the country with exclusivity. In 2007,
Chavez ordered all foreign companies to give up most of the control of their
exploration activities to the Venezuelan state. Companies with the Exxon did
not accept, had their property confiscated and legal battles for
indemnifications continue until the present day.
At PDVSA, there was no investment in
infrastructure and the company suffers from poor management and a high degree
of corruption. To get an idea, since August 2017, the Venezuelan court has
processed 90 former oil workers for corruption. In September, the Public
Prosecutor's Office arrested 9 directors.
The US Department of Justice also
conducted a Miami-based investigation that revealed a PDVSA money laundering
scheme that diverted $ 1.2 billion between 2014 and 2015. The operation called
Escape Money was co-operated by the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy and Malta. Two
suspects were arrested.
Another thing that helped to undermine
PDVSA's finances was the creation, under the Chavez government, of Petrocaribe,
an initiative in which Venezuela committed itself to supplying oil at much
lower prices to Caribbean countries allied with Chavismo, with long terms for
payment . It was like borrowing money back from sight. With the deepening of
the crisis, the initiative began to wane and countries like Jamaica and
Dominican Republic began to seek other contracts for their supply.
(2) DEPENDENCE ON IMPORTS, EXCHANGE
CONTROL AND PENALTIES
With the focus on oil and using some of
the money raised from fuel exports to support social programs, Chavismo has not
worried about the country's agricultural and industrial development. The
government has not invested in the oil industry itself - leading to a fall in
barrels production.
Chávez has taken a series of measures that
have hampered the development of local industry: nationalized the cement and
steel industries, among others, and expropriated hundreds of businesses and
rural properties.
The private sector was led to replace its
own production with cheaper imports, subsidized by the government. In addition,
the government adopted a policy of price control, artificially holding
inflation, which further helped to end local industry.
Venezuela has come to depend more and more
on imports - from food and medicine to tires and spare parts for the subway
system of major cities. In the past two years, with less money for imports, the
issue of shortages - and hence hunger - has worsened. Lack of toilet paper in
supermarkets.
The government also implemented a foreign
exchange policy to insure the value of the bolivar, the local currency,
controlling the purchase of dollars by the population, which generated a
parallel market of the sale of the American currency.
With exchange control there was a
significant increase in corruption, with a diversion of dollars to the parallel
market, where the currency was worth up to 12 times the official exchange
price. The government has tried various maneuvers to try to contain the
escalation of the parallel - like the creation of distinct exchange bands that
would be applied in different situations. But there was no concrete result and
the illegal exchange continued to erode the already weakened economic system.
Chavez capitalized on a social discontent
that had existed since past governments, with marked social inequality, and the
beginning of his rule marked by the high weight he gave to the state and the
populist aspect. This was characterized by a repudiation of private ownership
and a smaller role of the market, which resulted in a strict control of prices
and foreign exchange transactions.
It demonized the free market. The state
became a great productive and centralizing apparatus. So, this comes from a
strong foreign exchange subsidy, where artificially the local currency was
valued higher than the foreign ones. This has made it much cheaper for local
producers to import than to produce domestically.
The state also saw its public spending
increase to maintain social programs. Foreign debt also increased fivefold,
with the IMF forecast to hit $ 159 billion this year - this amount includes
government-issued debt securities issued by the government and PDVSA and
credits to China and Russia. By 2015, debt was $ 31 billion, according to IMF
estimates.
| The Bolivarian Nicolas Maduro with his main supporter Russian President Vladimir Putin |
Already very fragile, the economy suffered
a major blow in August last year, when the US imposed sanctions on the country
and some of its citizens. The Trump government has banned trading in Venezuelan
debt securities and buying bonds from state oil company PDVSA. In May of this
year, following the controversial re-election of Maduro, sanctions were
deepened with the limitation of the sale of Venezuelan government debt and
assets in American territory.
As most of the world financial system has
activities in the United States, sanctions make it very difficult for new loans
to be made to Venezuela and for the country to be able to sell new assets and
renegotiate its debts. On the other hand, its effects are questioned, since the
country was already isolated before that - organizations like the IMF no longer
gave money to Venezuela for years.
Critics say the sanctions have only
succeeded in getting Maduro to cling to power, as well as intensifying
shortages of commodities - since, without access to dollars, the country has
more difficulty importing goods.
The United States remains, however, one of
the main importers of Venezuelan oil - PDVSA has, even, a subsidiary on
American soil, Citgo. According to analysts, the Trump government does not
announce sanctions in this particular sector because that would deepen the
crisis in the country, which would increase the pressure on the US and its
neighbors. There are also those who cite the fact that stopping to buy the
Venezuelan product would lead to an increase in the prices of gasoline in the
American bombs.
![]() |
| The re-election of Maduro in 2018 was challenged inside and outside of Venezuela; the opposition does not recognize the victory and claims use of the state machine to get votes |
(3) HYPERINFLATION
In trying to overvalue the Venezuelan
currency, the government provoked distortions of values that, in addition to
causing the crisis of shortages, contributed to a scenario of hyperinflation.
In addition, with the fall in the price of
oil and a reduction in the flow of foreign exchange, the government started to
print more money to cover the gap in the public accounts and this was
generating more and more inflation.
The forecast by the International Monetary
Fund is that this year inflation in Venezuela will reach 1 million% (That means
you multiply by 10,000 the price of a product). By day, the IMF estimates the
value of inflation in the neighboring country at 4%.
Hyperinflation caused them to even run out
of cash, as people needed a lot more money to buy anything. To drink coffee or
buy toilet paper, for example, those who do not use the bank's debit card, have
to carry stacks of bolívar notes - when they could extract money.
With the shortage of producing currencies,
we used much more financing and printed a lot of money, with the State spending
without generating more resources.
![]() |
| The bolivars needed to buy a toilet paper; the government of Maduro cut some zeros of the coin to try to contain the devaluation. |
With the deterioration of the situation,
chavismo adopted a kind of artificial control of inflation: it forced merchants
to adopt a price below what they spent to produce, because they had to import
the inputs. Then industries and traders began to break.
Hyperinflation has spurred income and
poverty has increased. In 2017, the poverty line in the country of 30 million inhabitants
reached 87%, an increase of 40 percentage points in three years, according to a
survey by Andrés Bello Catholic University.
It is worth remembering that in the Chavez
era, poverty in Venezuela had fallen by more than 20%, according to ECLAC (Economic
Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean), and the country started to
register the lowest inequality between rich and poor between Latin countries
according to a UN report.
(4) POLITICAL CRISIS
Venezuela is also experiencing an intense
political crisis, which has not started yet, with the start of the second term
of Nicolás Maduro and the recent proclamation of opposition leader Juan Guaidó
as interim president.
The country is divided between the
Chavistas and the opponents, who are waiting for the end of the 19 years of
power of the group that currently meets around the United Socialist Party of
Venezuela (PSUV). In recent years, independence among Powers has been reduced
in practice, which has contributed even more to the current critical situation.
In 2009, in his second term, Chávez was
able, through a popular vote referendum, to change the constitution and change
the reelection rule for president. Since then, Venezuelan presidents have been
able to run for re-election without limits.
Chavismo, a power project that has been
consolidated since the first election of Hugo Chávez, has as central elements a
much greater role for the State and the defense of measures that expand social
participation in politics - an example is the organization of
"communes" in the poorest neighborhoods of the main cities, which in
turn articulate with the local legislature to present demands and control the
flow of input from some social programs.
It is also characterized by an
"anti-imperialist" policy, advocating the integration of the South
American peoples to combat the influence of the United States in the region. In
Chavismo, the president has his power based on a strong militarism.
After Chavez's death in 2013, Nicolás
Maduro, who was his vice president and also the PSUV, was already elected and
re-elected president with the promise of continuing the policies of the
predecessor.
But Maduro inherited Venezuela already
entering an economic collapse and took measures that contributed more to the
crisis.
In early 2014, the country was taken over
by a wave of protests against Maduro. The repression of the state was violent.
Between February and June, 43 people died. Opposition leader Leopoldo López was
arrested.
In 2015, Chavismo lost control of
Parliament and this made the situation of the country worse, as Maduro
constantly accuses the opposition of trying to get him out of power by means of
a coup.
After the defeat, he decided to convene a
National Constituent Assembly - in practice, a maneuver to completely empty the
power of the legislature commanded by the opponents and create a parallel
instance of decision.
And this parallel instance works with the
help of the Judiciary, which is accused by the opposition of being totally
Chavista, since the government indicated the majority of the judges - Chavez
increased the number of members of the Supreme Court of Justice (TSE),
equivalent to the STF in Brazil , to compose a majority with their nominees.
In March 2017, the TSJ assumed functions
of the Legislature, accusing the Parliament of disobedience. The lawsuit was
denounced as a coup by the opposition and, two days later, the court turned
back.
The accusation, therefore, is that there
is no independence between the Executive, Legislative and Judicial Powers in
Venezuela.
"In Venezuela, the judiciary is
politicized and very strong. It has become an executive annex," Rafael
Vila, a professor at the University of São Paulo's international relations
faculty, told BBC News.
In May 2017, after Maduro summoned the
Constituent Assembly, saying that it will renew the state and draft a new
constitution, Venezuela once again saw a wave of violent protests take over the
country. More than 120 people died and 2,000 were injured.
A year later, to aggravate the crisis,
Maduro was re-elected with 68 percent of the vote in a disputed election inside
and outside the country. The agent was reappointed to the post in a lawsuit
that had 54% of abstention.
At the time, defeated opposition candidate
Henri Falcon said he did not recognize the election and accused Maduro of using
the state to coerce the poorest to vote.
Falcon accused the government of
influencing voting through the Carné de la Patria, a document that allows
Venezuelans to collect government benefits and use public services. Maduro
promised that anyone who would vote on election day would be entitled to an
extra benefit from the government.
The opposition accused the government of
buying votes and most oppositionists boycotted the lawsuit. The government said
the elections were "free and fair". With many candidates -
non-governors unable to compete or arrested, the opposition said that the suit
has no legitimacy and that there are indications to distrust electoral fraud.
All this political instability has
contributed to aggravate the Venezuelan crisis.
Following the re-election of Maduro, the
Organization of American States (OAS) requested the suspension of Venezuela
from the entity. Brazil, besides the USA, Canada, Argentina, Peru and Mexico,
among others, was one of the countries that requested the suspension of
Venezuela from the continental organization, alleging disregard for the
Inter-American Democratic Charter and illegitimacy of Maduro's re-election.
The only two suspended countries of the
Organization of American States to date have been Cuba, in 62, when Fidel
Castro joined the then Soviet Union, and Honduras in 2009, following the coup
d'état that President Manuel Zelaya despoiled.
Venezuela had already stepped up to this
process and requested its withdrawal from the OAS in 2017, claiming that the
organization would be dominated by the American "imperial forces."
This fact, however, does not prevent the suspension process from continuing and
that the country feels its diplomatic effects. The suspension would mean that
all American nations have confirmed that Venezuela no longer follows the
democratic order.
If the suspension is confirmed, the
country will find it even more difficult to obtain international support,
especially in Europe and Asia.
The Inter-American Democratic Charter was
created in 2001 and regulates the functioning of the democracies of the 35
member states of the OAS. The document provides for the possibility of
suspension in case of non-compliance with the principles that govern it.
(5) MILITARY POWER AND PRESS CONTROL
Another point that contributed to the
Venezuelan crisis was the strong presence of the Army in the management of the
State.
After opposition candidate Juan Guaidó
self-declared new interim president of the country this week, Defense Minister
Vladimir Padrino tried to say that the Armed Forces were still alongside
Maduro. "Bolivarian National Armed Force at my command, maximum union,
maximum discipline, that we will win. Loyal always, traitors never",
delcarou.
In 25 years, Venezuela has suffered three
coup attempts by the military. One of them was set off by a group of which
Colonel Chavez was the leader in 1992.
Arrested after the attempted military
coup, he was released years later and managed to elect in 1998.
Chavez brought the Armed Forces to his government.
He appointed several generals to positions in state-owned enterprises,
replacing specialized technical staff.
One of the companies that had part of its
staff replaced by military personnel was the oil company PDVSA, which,
according to experts, explains in part the fact that it had not invested in
improvements, had not developed.
Chavismo also put military personnel to
act as ministers. One-third of Maduro's cabinet consists of military and
ex-military personnel.
By the Venezuelan Constitution, the Armed
Forces should be apolitical. But the defense minister, Gen. Vladimir Padrino,
writes in his dispatches, "Chávez lives, the homeland continues.
Independence and socialist homeland."
During the supply crisis that began in
2016, Maduro also passed the control of the production, import and distribution
of food to the Army. There are grave allegations of corruption involving
control of the military in this key sector in the crisis.
In other cases, chavismo has stifled the
supply of newspaper paper for vehicles of opposition publishing line - the
Venezuelan government controls, through a state corporation, the importation
and distribution of the input.





In this article, the main causes of the economic collapse that Venezuela is suffering are analyzed. A country shaken by extreme poverty and hyperinflation. Is international intervention the way out of the crisis that plagues the Venezuelan people? Hyperinflation, hunger and Poverty ravage the recent history of Venezuela. A problem that was born with Hugom Chavez and now grows mature. A crisis involving countries such as Russia, BRasil, USA, Bolivia.
ResponderExcluir